Concepts & Ideas · from Proxemics 013

PR vs Public Affairs: what’s the actual difference?

One manages how you’re seen; the other shapes the rules you live under. The clean line between reputation and regulation — from Proxemics 013.

8 min read · 12 Oct 2025 · Source: Proxemics 013

On Proxemics episode 013, hosts Mercy Tahitoe and Stephanie Sicilia put a deceptively simple question to their guest — Jeffrey Haribowo, Corporate Affairs Director for the cocoa business at Mars Wrigley Indonesia: is public relations just polishing a company’s image, while public affairs quietly rewrites the law? It sounds like a turf war between two job titles. It is really one of the most useful distinctions in modern communications — and one that even seasoned practitioners blur. Here is the full answer the episode only had time to sketch.

The short answer

Public relations manages perception — how audiences see an organisation. Public affairs manages policy — the laws and regulations that organisation must operate under. PR works on the story; public affairs works on the rules that govern the story. They share tools and instincts, but answer to different audiences, on different clocks, with different definitions of winning.

Key takeaways

Listen & watch

The YouTube player is episode 013; the Spotify and Apple embeds open the series (episode-level deep links to follow).

What is public relations?

Public relations is the practice of managing an organisation’s reputation and its relationships with the public. Its raw materials are narrative, media, timing and tone. When a company launches a product, apologises for a mistake, announces a partnership, or tries to shift the mood around its brand, that is PR at work — the craft consultancies like Praxis are built around. The audience is broad — customers, journalists, employees, the general public — and the scoreboard is sentiment: media coverage, share of voice, brand favourability, whether the room warms or cools.

Crucially, PR does not change the rules an organisation lives under. It changes how those rules, and the organisation itself, are understood. It is a discipline of persuasion and storytelling, and its best work is often invisible: a crisis that never escalated, a reputation quietly rebuilt.

What is public affairs?

Public affairs is the practice of engaging the policy and regulatory environment that governs an organisation. If PR asks “how do people see us?”, public affairs asks “what are we allowed to do, and who decides?” Its arena is the machinery of government: the ministries drafting regulations, the legislators writing statutes, the agencies interpreting and enforcing them.

In Indonesia, that machinery is a hierarchy, and public affairs works up and down it — from the constitution (Undang-Undang Dasar) at the top, to statutes (Undang-Undang), to government regulations (Peraturan Pemerintah), down to the ministerial regulations (Peraturan Menteri) that decide the day-to-day. A single ministerial decree most people never read can reshape an entire industry. Public affairs is the discipline of noticing that decree while it is still a draft — and having something credible to say about it — specialised work that dedicated public-affairs firms like Prajna are built for.

That credibility is the part outsiders miss. Good public affairs is not lobbying in the cynical sense of a quiet word and a favour. It is evidence: data, research, and a documented account of impact — how many jobs, which supply chains, what second-order effects a proposed rule would trigger. Assembling that evidence usually begins with disciplined media monitoring — the kind Explicar specialises in.

PR vs public affairs: a side-by-side

DimensionPublic relationsPublic affairs
Core questionHow are we perceived?What are we permitted to do?
Works onThe storyThe rules
Primary audiencePublic, media, customersRegulators, legislators, ministries
ArenaMedia, events, socialPolicy, regulation, lawmaking
TimescaleNews cycle, launch weekLegislative sessions, years
CurrencyNarrative and relationshipsEvidence and data
Success looks likeFavourable coverage, sentimentA workable rule — or a bad one that never passes

Where PR and public affairs overlap

The two disciplines share DNA. Both are about influence, both require reading an audience precisely, and both fail the same way — when they are reactive instead of planned. A company that only calls PR after a crisis has already hit is in the same position as one that discovers a regulation only after it has passed. In both cases, the real work is upstream. Many organisations also house both functions under one “corporate affairs” umbrella, which is exactly why the roles get blurred — and why being precise about the difference matters.

Why the distinction matters

Because the two require different people, different evidence, and different definitions of success — and organisations that treat them as one thing tend to under-invest in the harder, slower one. Perception problems are visible; you feel the bad press. Policy problems are invisible until they are law, and by then the room to influence them has closed. On the episode, Jeffrey Haribowo put the bar for public affairs bluntly:

“Public affairs itu nggak boleh debat kusir. Lo harus evidence based.”

— Jeffrey Haribowo, on Proxemics 013 (23:36) · “Public affairs can’t be a pointless argument. You have to be evidence-based.”

The line captures the whole discipline. Bring opinion to a policy table and you lose to whoever brought a spreadsheet. The counter-arguments are built on data, so yours must be too.

A quick glossary

Public affairs
Evidence-based engagement with the policies and regulations that govern an organisation, across the whole lawmaking process.
Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD)
Indonesia’s constitution — the top of the legal hierarchy.
Undang-Undang (UU)
A statute passed by the legislature (DPR) with the government.
Peraturan Pemerintah (PP)
A government regulation that implements a statute.
Peraturan Menteri (Permen)
A ministerial regulation — granular rules that shape an industry day-to-day.
Debat kusir
An Indonesian idiom — literally a coachman’s quarrel — for an argument that goes in circles and settles nothing.

Frequently asked questions

Is public affairs the same as lobbying?
No — lobbying is one tool inside public affairs. Public affairs is broader: policy research, stakeholder engagement, coalition-building and communication across the whole lawmaking process, not only direct persuasion of legislators.
Is public affairs part of PR, or separate?
They are distinct disciplines that often sit under one “corporate affairs” function. PR manages perception; public affairs manages policy. Sharing a department does not make them the same job.
What does “evidence-based” advocacy mean?
Bringing data, research and documented impact to a policy conversation rather than opinion. As Jeffrey Haribowo put it on Proxemics 013, public affairs can’t be debat kusir — the argument has to be built on proof.
Which comes first in a crisis — PR or public affairs?
It depends on the crisis. A reputational hit is a PR problem first; a regulatory threat is a public affairs problem first. Mature organisations run both in parallel, because a story and a rule can move at the same time.
Do small companies need public affairs?
Any organisation affected by regulation does — even if it is one person tracking the rules that shape their market. The function scales down to “notice the draft decree before it becomes law.”
Watch the source episode
Proxemics 013 — PR vs Public Affairs, with Jeffrey Haribowo
Full show notes, people, and transcript →
By the White Wood editorial desk · Produced by White Wood for Proxemics · This is an exploratory explainer that extends Proxemics episode 013; it is not a verbatim transcript.